Redefining Housing Affordability | Planetizen News

A new study from the Uni­ver­si­ty of , Berke­ley’s Tern­er Cen­ter for Hous­ing Inno­va­tion attempts to the con­ver­sa­tion about hous­ing afford­abil­i­ty.

As Erin Bal­das­sari explains in an arti­cle for KQED, the study “argues the clas­sic — ‘Is a place afford­able?’ — should instead be sup­plant­ed with a new one: ‘Who can afford this place?’” The sub­tle dif­fer­ence between those two ques­tions can illu­mi­nate dis­par­i­ties. For exam­ple, “we’ve been say­ing Bev­er­ly Hills is per­fect­ly afford­able because the peo­ple who live there can afford it.”

To shift to a new def­i­n­i­tion of afford­abil­i­ty, researchers used data about hous­ing costs, , and oth­er expens­es to assess afford­abil­i­ty by coun­ty for all Cal­i­for­ni­ans. “The result is an inter­ac­tive map shows how many Cal­i­for­ni­ans could afford to live in each coun­ty — which paints a much bleak­er pic­ture of the state’s expen­sive areas than had pre­vi­ous­ly been shown.” The study also accounts for things like access to trans­porta­tion, which can low­er the cost of liv­ing in urban areas, some­what bal­anc­ing out more expen­sive rents.

The study’s find­ings could lead to changes in how pol­i­cy­mak­ers afford­abil­i­ty to account for over­all costs — but changes to hous­ing assis­tance pro­grams would like­ly require major injec­tions of new .

Read More

Leave a Comment